instagram takipci satin al - instagram takipci satin al mobil odeme - takipci satin al

bahis siteleri - deneme bonusu - casino siteleri

bahis siteleri - kacak bahis - canli bahis

goldenbahis - makrobet - cepbahis

cratosslot - cratosslot giris - cratosslot

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

cone / conical springs?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    cone / conical springs?

    <standard disclaimer, I'm still a cocker rookie>

    I don't recall coming across conical springs before, but just found two in a row in what looks to be otherwise-mundane 2000-2004 cocker's valve sets.

    Are / were these common? Is there a specific outcome/application for them? Not getting anywhere on the googles

    Attached Files

    #2
    Not super common there was one of the suppliers over the years that used them but I do not remember who. For our purposes not necessary but will no hurt operation given the spring rate is correct. I have used random compression springs in my setups from all sorts of sources I just pick one that has the rates, diameter and length I'm looking for. The one on the Right side has been clipped by someone which I will do but they should have dead ended the spring after clipping for less wear damage and better spring rate consistency.

    The one advantage is you theoretically can use a longer lower rate spring when using a conical spring to get less valve bounce and farting but I never tested out this theory as I rarely care about a little farting I do it often


    "When you are asked if you can do a job, tell 'em, 'Certainly I can!' Then get busy and find out how to do it." - Theodore Roosevelt

    Feedback Link - https://www.mcarterbrown.com/forum/b...del-s-feedback

    Comment


      #3
      Main benefit that I am aware of is they are naturally resistant to bending. If you compress one it should be less likely to develop a sideways bulge than a straight spring will. I've used them in Nightmares for that reason.
      PeculiarPaintball.com

      PeculiarPaintball on Youtube

      PeculiarPaintball on Facebook

      RuleOfSines Feedback

      Comment


        #4
        Kind of thought the wide end fit the valve chamber and the narrow end fit the cup seal.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	100_0193.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	4.08 MB
ID:	673796

        Comment


        • Jonnydread

          Jonnydread

          commented
          Editing a comment
          I seem to recall that's how older Spyder valve springs were designed.

        #5
        spyders are set up that way (conical on the cupseal) but both the sets I'd pictured had the conical on the hammer side.

        Comment


          #6
          I'll admit what I pictured came in a lot.
          I made the assumption that since the valves were bagged together with a PPS 3-way that they were 'Cocker valves, perhaps PPS as well.
          I'd have to take a closer look at the valve stems. If they are cut for blowback, they likely match Kingman.
          Speaking of Kingman, I have a Spyder I bought in '97 (98?). Way back when.
          The cup-seal spring is not tapered, but centered by a fingered washer. Hard to explain, I'll get pics next time I dig it out.

          For the 'Cocker, I would assume (there's that word again) that being a mainspring the wider end is pocketed into the hammer and the smaller end pushes back against the IVG, being centered by the cocking rod.

          Comment

          Working...
          X