instagram takipci satin al - instagram takipci satin al mobil odeme - takipci satin al

bahis siteleri - deneme bonusu - casino siteleri

bahis siteleri - kacak bahis - canli bahis

goldenbahis - makrobet - cepbahis

cratosslot - cratosslot giris - cratosslot

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clapper-noid Blowbacks: Electros or Still Mech?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Will it function properly without a battery?

    Yes=Mech

    No=Electro

    Comment


      #17
      I think we need to address the type of answer based on the context.

      1) "Electro" in the game play/player, style on the field.

      2) "Electro" in the sense of the technical nature of the markers action.

      In case one, it really is the "feature set" qualifications. Does it have microchip controlled firing modes, allowing for ease of use regarding rates of fire? Then yes it is "electro", as in this case we are trying to set a more "equal playing field" with style of play and players. I think this is where people are most salty on the definition as it effects the rental/rec/walk-on play style.

      In case two, we start to get into the manner in which the marker operates as Fubarius outlined. In that case there is certainly several more specific definitions that need to be taken into account (spools, popits with spring return, popits with piston return, etc). In that case I would agree E-Frame STBB markers are electro-mechanical.

      Velcor will save us...

      Current MCB Feedback : https://www.mcarterbrown.com/forum/b...opusx-feedback
      Legacy MCB Feedback (Wayback Machine)

      Comment


        #18
        I do not understand what is polarizing?
        For the last 20+ years, anything with an electronic trigger has been considered "electro". A blowback is just a simple pneumatic ram. So an E-spyder that uses a noid to trip a hammer is not much different mechanically then a fully pneumatic hammer, with the fasor somewhere in the middle.

        The term "electro" refers to the trigger actuating system. On that regard, there might be a debate about the early electro cockers. Some of the very first ones in the late 90s used a hybrid system, using a mechanical hammer release, but an electropneumatic ram.... So a lighter trigger, electrics involved... but a partially mech trigger? still electro to me but that is harder to define.

        On that regard, its like the old Air Power Vector. It had a pneumatic trigger, but years later, someone tried to patent an pneumatic trigger to sell cocker conversions..... blocking others from selling the same. Was the original vector a P/T? The trigger only actuated the ram, but it had a linkage to prevent short strokes. So, again, a grey area in the definition.

        Comment


          #19
          If it requires a battery, it's an electro. The same thing could be said for modern spool valve markers. Slap a mechanical frame on a Gamma Core marker and you have an Emek. Take the same gun and throw an electronic frame on it and it becomes an Etha 2. I actually have this very setup in my gun case. Whether it's a spool valve marker or a poppet is irrelevant.
          My Feedback Thread

          Comment


            #20
            Electro

            It's not about the internals of the marker it's about how the trigger functions

            There's e mags and mech mags as well and even though the e mags are technically electro assist, they are still considered e markers

            Here's a screwball for you though, valken proton. Clapper noid directly actuated a spool valve

            Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk

            I use Tapatalk which does NOT display comments. If you want me to see it, make it a post not a comment.

            Feedback
            https://www.mcarterbrown.com/forum/b...323-s-feedback

            Comment


              #21
              Are there electronics in the gun? Yes?

              It's electronic.

              Comment

              Working...
              X