instagram takipci satin al - instagram takipci satin al mobil odeme - takipci satin al

bahis siteleri - deneme bonusu - casino siteleri

bahis siteleri - kacak bahis - canli bahis

goldenbahis - makrobet - cepbahis

cratosslot - cratosslot giris - cratosslot

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

+/- regulator claims

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    +/- regulator claims

    You really don't see this talked about anymore, but I was reminded of this when coming across old posts on other forums talking about how efficient certain regulators are, then throw out these silly anecdotal claims of one reg getting +/- 5 but oh, this nicer more expensive one can get +/- 2!!!!
    Feedback 3.0

    #2
    I still take this Into consideration, but more as a reflection of paint quality.

    Originally posted by Terry A. Davis
    God said 640x480 16 color was a covenant like circumcision.

    Comment


    • iamthelazerviking
      iamthelazerviking commented
      Editing a comment
      Exactly right. The dates of the those old claims definitely align with when paint quality was better.

    #3
    Unless I can get paint that aint egg shaped, dimpled like a golf ball, or so brittle it breaks inside the hopper running to the bunker. F all this noise about what gear has the best "performance"! XD

    Comment


      #4
      The fact people fall for (not pulling punches let's name names) powerhouses crazy expensive regs marketing is beyond me.

      This $200 reg will get you +/- 2 fps!!

      Bruh.... Paint is barely+/-.015 lately never mind round
      ​​​

      Comment


        #5
        I’d say you don’t see it talked about anymore because you can’t replace the reg on any of today’s high end guns. The people buying high end guns were the people looking to buy things like that and that option has been taken away.

        Comment


          #6
          No reg can make crap paint shoot better. But I still have my favorites when it comes to choosing one. I don’t mind paying for quality and reliability, I know it when I see it.

          I like nice stuff, so shoot me…. (If yah can)

          Comment


            #7
            one of the reasons we always published chrono with our tests.

            1. was to show we measured it and cared.
            2. was to show how actually inconsistent guns really are.

            Comment


              #8
              Originally posted by cockerpunk View Post
              one of the reasons we always published chrono with our tests.

              1. was to show we measured it and cared.
              2. was to show how actually inconsistent guns really are.
              My marker could be shooting +-20fps and I would not care as long as it shot under the field limit. Velocity does not mean anything if the balls are hooking close too 90 degrees less than 50 feet after leaving the barrel.
              Last edited by MrKittyCatMeowFace; 10-18-2023, 05:47 PM.

              Comment


                #9
                Originally posted by k_obeastly View Post
                I'd say you don't see it talked about anymore because you can't replace the reg on any of today's high end guns. The people buying high end guns were the people looking to buy things like that and that option has been taken away.
                And there it is.

                Marker specific parts mean you have nothing to compare

                Really there's no reason why the industry can't have standardized gas through grip ASAs or on grip regulators to be universal but that would mean companies would have to talk and agree so, what are you going to do?

                Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk

                I use Tapatalk which does NOT display comments. If you want me to see it, make it a post not a comment.

                Feedback
                https://www.mcarterbrown.com/forum/b...323-s-feedback

                Comment


                  #10
                  Originally posted by Trbo323 View Post

                  Really there's no reason why the industry can't have standardized gas through grip ASAs or on grip regulators to be universal but that would mean companies would have to talk and agree so, what are you going to do?
                  We basically did have that up until starting about 10 years ago with the LV1 and the hoseless trend. I'm not sure if Eclipse was the first but I feel like they at least took it from a couple boutique shops into the mainstream
                  Dulce et decorum est pro comoedia mori

                  Comment


                    #11
                    Originally posted by Axel View Post

                    We basically did have that up until starting about 10 years ago with the LV1 and the hoseless trend. I'm not sure if Eclipse was the first but I feel like they at least took it from a couple boutique shops into the mainstream
                    Planet Eclipse was laughably late to the hoseless game. The Invert Mini and the LUXE were the first [modern] hoseless guns. The LV1 and Geo 3.1 (which weren't truly hoseless) were a good 3-4 years behind the real trend setters. There were something like 10 different, and very popular, hoseless designs out before PE came out with the A/T pipe.

                    I agree with the sentiment, just disagree that Eclipse isn't the culprit.

                    Comment


                      #12
                      The original trend setter

                      Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk

                      I use Tapatalk which does NOT display comments. If you want me to see it, make it a post not a comment.

                      Feedback
                      https://www.mcarterbrown.com/forum/b...323-s-feedback

                      Comment


                      • Brokeass_baller

                        Brokeass_baller

                        commented
                        Editing a comment
                        You ever notice how similar the grip is to the Dye UL hourglass, too? It's just a bit meatier at the bottom.

                      #13
                      Paint quality > pressure regulation.

                      I only worry about pressure regulation if the marker absolutely needs it. To me, extra regulators are just another thing to go wrong, and I don’t buy into the LP hype. If I actually need one I tend to go with what is easily rebuildable and/or or is known to be bulletproof.
                      New Feedback

                      Comment


                        #14
                        phantoms with only a tank reg can get good numbers. id assume snipers can get consistent too.
                        MY FEEDBACK: https://www.mcarterbrown.com/forum/b...0%99s-feedback

                        Comment


                          #15
                          Paint quality aside, regs are important. Let's say you get a few dirty fills and your tank reg is bouncing all over the place, a palmers stab will handle it better than most. iirc Glen said for every 70psi drop in the tank pressure you have a 1fps change in velocity - 70:1 - I wonder what some of these modern in-grip regs are at.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X