Ok, touchy issue here and old man ranting-mode enabled, but:
Is it just me that's doesn't give a damn about the tournament scene? I mean, when you look at the promotional/marketing material from paintball manufacturers and retailers, you'd think that the bulk of their business involves the tournament scene. Also, you have all those paintball videos about player X moving to team Y, team A vs. team B... I don't know about you guys, but I do.not.care.
Now, before I get a flight of poisoned-tip arrows slung towards me, a few caveats: I respect tournament players, in that you need skill forged by discipline to get where you're at. If you want to get really good at paintball, you have to look at what they're doing and go at it. The fact that they'll shoot in one month what the average player may shoot in a year is a good thing because paintball manufacturers base their specs and requirements upon what tourney players go through. Succinctly put, if that solenoid can easily handle, say, 250 000 cycles in one year without wear for a tourney player, that will be more than enough for the average recball player.
Yet, how many times do you hear manufacturers/retailers say stuff like "that marker is reliable, you'll spend less time in the pit or miss your next point". Pit? Point? I play in the goddam woods, thank you. What? I can't have an LV2 and play in the woods? Or at scenario games? It's as if the mentality is "for you plebes, an A-5, an Emek or at the most, a 180R should be good enough". What would be really interesting is to see the % of high-ends and super high-ends (I define 'high end' as guns like the 180R, DSR+, Shocker, etc,. and 'super high-end' as the CS3, M3+, Luxe, etc.) actually sold to the rec crowd vs the tourney crowd. I'd venture a guess that a substantial % is sold to players that will never set foot on a speedball field.
Thoughts?
Is it just me that's doesn't give a damn about the tournament scene? I mean, when you look at the promotional/marketing material from paintball manufacturers and retailers, you'd think that the bulk of their business involves the tournament scene. Also, you have all those paintball videos about player X moving to team Y, team A vs. team B... I don't know about you guys, but I do.not.care.
Now, before I get a flight of poisoned-tip arrows slung towards me, a few caveats: I respect tournament players, in that you need skill forged by discipline to get where you're at. If you want to get really good at paintball, you have to look at what they're doing and go at it. The fact that they'll shoot in one month what the average player may shoot in a year is a good thing because paintball manufacturers base their specs and requirements upon what tourney players go through. Succinctly put, if that solenoid can easily handle, say, 250 000 cycles in one year without wear for a tourney player, that will be more than enough for the average recball player.
Yet, how many times do you hear manufacturers/retailers say stuff like "that marker is reliable, you'll spend less time in the pit or miss your next point". Pit? Point? I play in the goddam woods, thank you. What? I can't have an LV2 and play in the woods? Or at scenario games? It's as if the mentality is "for you plebes, an A-5, an Emek or at the most, a 180R should be good enough". What would be really interesting is to see the % of high-ends and super high-ends (I define 'high end' as guns like the 180R, DSR+, Shocker, etc,. and 'super high-end' as the CS3, M3+, Luxe, etc.) actually sold to the rec crowd vs the tourney crowd. I'd venture a guess that a substantial % is sold to players that will never set foot on a speedball field.
Thoughts?
Comment