instagram takipci satin al - instagram takipci satin al mobil odeme - takipci satin al

bahis siteleri - deneme bonusu - casino siteleri

bahis siteleri - kacak bahis - canli bahis

goldenbahis - makrobet - cepbahis

cratosslot - cratosslot giris - cratosslot

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Data that disproves the "I can hit 15bps in true semi" argument

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Data that disproves the "I can hit 15bps in true semi" argument

    So as we all know we see this argument all the time of people trying to claim they can hit unrealistic numbers without bounce... well I got tired of it and did some digging on the old interwebz and came across some applicable data... because yes I am that much of a nerd:

    Here is a study that actually looked at how fast people can tap their fingers https://www.researchgate.net/publica...d_the_Effects_ of_Various_Factors (if you click download it will let you get to the full study without a sign up).

    The fastest 5 second block was seen in males 18-29. The best numbers were by left handed individuals by a notable margin. Their dominate index finger clicked 30.3 (+/- 2.4) and middle was 28.8 (+/-2.3). So 59.1 clicks between the two over 5 seconds was 11.82 clicks per second. And this was the best block they achieved in their testing.

    Right handed individuals were slower with females 18-29 having the best numbers at 27.5(+/-3.6) for index and 26.7(+/-3.1), resulting in 54.2 clicks over 5 seconds or 10.84 cps.

    Sure you may find some outliers in the population but the data shows that your 15+ bps is not actually happening and is not maintainable as this data is the best block the participants got.

    Enjoy, and use as you need
    ā€‹

    #2
    I can shoot 16bps with my single shot pistol šŸ˜†
    šŸ’€Team RagnastockšŸ’€
    Ion Long Rifle
    Spyder Pump
    BST Feedback
    Brass Thread

    WTB Sheridan Parts

    Comment


      #3
      Ergonomics are important - the study was the home row of a keyboard versus a trigger frame. It also ran a full minute, which is a LONG time to be hammering away full speed.

      A crappy 2008-era website told me I hit 18 clicks per second using two fingers on my mouse. I'm sure that was research grade data.
      Feedback
      www.PhrameworkDesigns.com < Nelspot sears and triggers back in stock! Also Sterling feeds, Empire feedneck adapters, and some upcoming projects.

      Comment


      • SR_matt
        SR_matt commented
        Editing a comment
        To be fair probably the same micro switch in the mouse as the triggers so the ROF with bounce was probably accurate haha

        and yeah that study is a bit long of a time period but they took the best 5 second run (which I assume is more likely to be at the start of the run). I suspect that the keyboard test actually probably gives people a bit higher rate too than what may be achievable with a marker just due to the position and ergonomics of it all.

      • Psycho91

        Psycho91

        commented
        Editing a comment
        I remember that, used to play it all the time

      #4
      I recall an article, roughly a million years ago, that described one of the major tournament promoters, in an attempt to quantify just how fast the then-new electronic guns were shooting, brought a PACT shooting timer to an event. This was the earliest days of things like the Angel, 'shoebox' Shocker and Intimidator, though I don't recall if 'cheater boards' were really out yet. (Save of course for the SP "Turbo" boards.)

      As I vaguely recall, the fastest player was a fellow with an Angel- I think this was before the LCD came out- who I believe hit 14 BPS, but the vast majority of other players were hard pressed to do 10-12. And none could sustain the max for long. (I seem to recall the 14/sec guy being described as looking like he was having a seizure in the attempt. )

      I will admit that, from a purely gearhead-related point of view, I got a kick out of the ROF wars. It was fascinating to see just how fast we could get a marker to cycle- with the fastest I ever saw being a super-slo-mo video of a DYE gun and Rotor hitting right at 40 BPS.

      But from an actual player point of view, I had a sinking feeling even back then that it was going to wind up toxic for the sport.

      Doc.
      Doc's Machine & Airsmith Services: Creating the Strange and Wonderful since 1998!
      The Whiteboard: Daily, occasionally paintball-related webcomic mayhem!
      Paintball in the Movies!

      Comment


        #5
        On my best day, 6 maybe 7.

        Comment


          #6
          This test data isnā€™t very helpfulā€¦

          How fast someone can push a button hugely depends on what that button is and the posture used. If itā€™s a double or an RT trigger or some other bump effect thatā€™s another factor.

          A human being absolutely can hit ā€œa buttonā€ 16 times in a second. This has been well documented and somewhat obsessed about by gaming celebrities in Japan in the 80s. Takahashi Meijin is nicknamed ā€œ16-shotā€ exactly because he could hit a button on a Famicom pad at 16 shots per second.

          Hudson produced a product called ā€œShooting Watchā€ which counts your total shots over 10 seconds. I have one of those. I can hit 90-somethingā€¦Chousanjuan broke my record by quite a bit but IIRC his finger was bleeding afterwards. I think he got like 111.

          Comment


            #7
            FWIW I have never been a very fast shooter, as a primarily front player "fast enough" was all I really cared about. Something odd I've noticed on my rare forays into electro play is that I am significantly faster with my left hand, though I am quite right dominant. Maybe something about power vs. precision?
            šŸ’€ PK x Ragnastock šŸ’€

            Comment


              #8
              Originally posted by flyweightnate View Post
              A crappy 2008-era website told me I hit 18 clicks per second using two fingers on my mouse. I'm sure that was research grade data.
              I'm glad I'm not the only one that partook in that website... I'm sure the link was floating around all the paintball forums of the time.

              Comment


                #9
                Originally posted by DocsMachine View Post
                I recall an article, roughly a million years ago, that described one of the major tournament promoters, in an attempt to quantify just how fast the then-new electronic guns were shooting, brought a PACT shooting timer to an event. This was the earliest days of things like the Angel, 'shoebox' Shocker and Intimidator, though I don't recall if 'cheater boards' were really out yet. (Save of course for the SP "Turbo" boards.)

                As I vaguely recall, the fastest player was a fellow with an Angel- I think this was before the LCD came out- who I believe hit 14 BPS, but the vast majority of other players were hard pressed to do 10-12. And none could sustain the max for long. (I seem to recall the 14/sec guy being described as looking like he was having a seizure in the attempt. )

                I will admit that, from a purely gearhead-related point of view, I got a kick out of the ROF wars. It was fascinating to see just how fast we could get a marker to cycle- with the fastest I ever saw being a super-slo-mo video of a DYE gun and Rotor hitting right at 40 BPS.

                But from an actual player point of view, I had a sinking feeling even back then that it was going to wind up toxic for the sport.

                Doc.
                yeah I took a long hiatus (2009-2023) and when I came back I saw that dye shot with the rotor and some dye marker... granted I believe they had to basically force the board to shoot as fast as possible once the ball was far enough into the breach to not chop.

                Back in the 2000s I remember the big video floating around what the mag hooked directly to a 3k scuba tank with a q-loader and the mag still managed to over shoot the q loader and activate level 10 if I remember right.

                One guy I met at the field has a bit of a conspiracy theoryā€‹ that the 10.5bps cap is actually there to get people to shoot more paint. While I am not sure if I believe that there is some organized conspiracy taking this into account I think the result he sees is probably accurate. the higher ROF days made people choose shots better and we saw a lot more real snap shooting. Now it's just find a bunker and "lane". less movement, a lot more "suppressing" now.

                Comment


                  #10
                  Originally posted by Jonnydread View Post
                  FWIW I have never been a very fast shooter, as a primarily front player "fast enough" was all I really cared about. Something odd I've noticed on my rare forays into electro play is that I am significantly faster with my left hand, though I am quite right dominant. Maybe something about power vs. precision?
                  Ever play a string instrument? I know my left has is also faster but I grew up playing multiple string instruments so I assume that has at least some of it (but that was 14 years of pretty much daily practice with those muscles to get a minimal increase).

                  Comment


                  • Jonnydread

                    Jonnydread

                    commented
                    Editing a comment
                    No sir, no real common practices or hobbies that would have trained me that I can think of.

                  #11
                  I can hold 10 consistently but nothing over that and that's the fastest I can shoot, I also hold and shoot a PB marker better left handed but I'm right hand dominate

                  Comment


                    #12
                    And to think, back in the early to mid 90s it was widely believed that Tim "Sandman" Glavin clocking just over 9 bps with a stock Automag was pushing the limits of human ability to repeatedly pull a trigger quickly.

                    To be fair, pulling a stock, classic Automag trigger at 9 bps without short stroking is indeed a nontrivial feat.

                    The Automag: Not as clumsy or random as an electro. An elegant marker for a more civilised age.

                    www.reddit.com/u/MrBarraclough

                    Comment


                    • SR_matt
                      SR_matt commented
                      Editing a comment
                      and then the lord created the RT on/off.

                      Granted good chance he was still running co2 on that mag too so freezing was just as much of an issue as chuffing haha, then again HPA was introduced in 91 so maybe he was on HPA by then.

                    • MrBarraclough

                      MrBarraclough

                      commented
                      Editing a comment
                      He was using CO2. Using a 7oz bottle with this big downward loop of steel braid between the ASA and valve body as a kind of crude anti-siphon/expansion system.

                      The demonstration was a kind of bonus clip at the end of the VHS tape instruction video that came with new mags back then.

                    • SR_matt
                      SR_matt commented
                      Editing a comment
                      Hahaha nice, Iā€™m still disappointed that mags were not widely used in my area until the mid 2000s when one guy got a Tac one and then we all followed suit with different mags of our own.

                    #13
                    In the interest of science... 10.6 on a mouse with two fingers, and 8.8 on a space bar with two fingers.

                    Unsurprisingly, I am average, according to that study.
                    Feedback
                    www.PhrameworkDesigns.com < Nelspot sears and triggers back in stock! Also Sterling feeds, Empire feedneck adapters, and some upcoming projects.

                    Comment


                      #14
                      Right handed my cocker registers 13bps

                      Left. Like 10 maybe

                      This is all without air, so very little marker/frame movement

                      But this is also with some practice. I'm assuming the study above was not done with years of practice and it also looks like they separated index and middle fingers rather than counting them at the same time

                      It's a little misleading to label it as "as fast as humans can go" without allowing for the test subjects to really practice for a long time. Clearly some paintballers are able to hit faster speeds. I have no doubt some players can hit 15 if I can hit 13 with minimal practice

                      Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk

                      I use Tapatalk which does NOT display comments. If you want me to see it, make it a post not a comment.

                      Feedback
                      https://www.mcarterbrown.com/forum/b...323-s-feedback

                      Comment


                        #15
                        Originally posted by Trbo323 View Post
                        Right handed my cocker registers 13bps

                        Left. Like 10 maybe

                        This is all without air, so very little marker/frame movement

                        But this is also with some practice. I'm assuming the study above was not done with years of practice and it also looks like they separated index and middle fingers rather than counting them at the same time

                        It's a little misleading to label it as "as fast as humans can go" without allowing for the test subjects to really practice for a long time. Clearly some paintballers are able to hit faster speeds. I have no doubt some players can hit 15 if I can hit 13 with minimal practice

                        Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk
                        To be fair though, a large portion of the younger side of this study likely was typing on keyboards for 20+ years and had typing classes ins school to learn to type as fast as possible so probably pretty justifiable to say that they had plenty of practice.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X