I might be wrong, but then that's not new. The back of the cylinders have a flange, making them front load only. So the bolt can only move forward until flush with the flange on the back of the cylinder. Wouldn't this make the foamy thing useless?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Umarex to make a 68 caliber, 5-shot revolver- HDR-68
Collapse
X
-
Ok.....fielded mine this weekend.
I immediately ordered number 2.
Using very old first strike i only had one brake but it was mid barrel so I think the zoom dot zoom died.
However..... If you look at the cylinder there's an interesting added bonus, a nub that aligns and fits into the groove on the round effectively forcing it to spin.
At full 280 fps it's a long balling champion. Once I get the hand of shooting and aiming it I could place accurate single shots well out of range of conventional paint.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
I've been busy with various BS for the past month, and I see these are finally released. We're a dealer at the field, but still haven't gotten ours yet. I've got some ideas for velocity adjusters from looks of the pictures, but won't really know anything until I get me hands on one.
Humorously enough, I thought about a soft tip bolt back with the HDR/TR50, but it would require a whole new bolt (which wouldn't be a bad idea, as the stock bolts are ridiculously soft Chinesium) so it doesn't protrude when aired up. I see the HDR68 is basically the same. I've still got some ideas for both the 50 and 68, which could further increase efficiency, decrease bolt speed (the reason it's so hard on paint), and allow for velocity adjustment.I can haz feedback?
If I owe you feedback, just remind me, as I sometimes forget.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Has anyone played around with regulating this or the 50 cal version. I would think a regulator may be able to use its "slower" recharge rate much the same way the restricted flow of the valve to allow the valve on this to shut without an on/off. Then it would also allow adjustment of the velocity by pressure. I would think it may also allow you to reduce the return spring pressure which may lead to better efficiency. There should be plenty of room in the grip to add a smaller reg/12gram changer (like a cart reg or another equivalent set up) if this is indeed a decent option.
Most of the mods for higher power I have seen has been to dump more gas downrange by removing the flow restrictors and shortening the bolt internal shaft. Each of these would work but have terrible impact on efficiency.
Comment
-
The velocity needs to go down on the 50 cal, so ref is an option, velocity needs to go up on the 68 cal, so increasing chamber volume is one of the only route without re-designing the entire valve ...
I seam to get around 20 shot with the increase chamber (4 mags) which is good enough for me ...
But, if anyone comes up with something cool, I'll definitely give it a go 😁
-
20shots is a great shot count, what velocity are you getting on them? And I am interested to see what you have done for larger volume
I wonder if increasing chamber volume is really needed (beyond removing the restriction sleeve). Obviously there is some other factors when comparing this to a Mag, but efficiency mods on mags involve reducing the volume of the chamber. I do not believe the volume of the "chamber" on this is at least as large as a reduced volume mag.
Increased flow (not sure how to get this), reduced spring tension, and a standard pressure I think would be a good combination but that is all hypothetical.
I am super interested to see how Y'all do this however.
-
I've discussed a bit my idea for a regulator for the HDR/TR50 elsewhere on the forum (might be in the members only section). I have some designs in minds, but the biggest problem is cost. I'd estimate a regulator design to be $100+, which is a hard sell for a marker that only cost ~$100. It's already a hard sell on the volumetric adjuster at $45 shipped, which only profits me enough to maybe buy dinner off of a fast-food dollar menu (well, they will eventually if I sell enough of them). Not that I'm complaining, as I didn't really do it for the money. I'd just like to eventually break even on my initial cost of getting them made.
-
-
Love my brass ... Love my SSR ... Hard choices ...
XEMON's phantom double sided feed
Keep your ATS going: Project rATS 2.0
My Feedback
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Did these ever go up for sale? I’d be interested in 2 of them if there are any still around.
-
Yes, shoot me a PM 👍
Here is a thread I made a while back: https://www.mcarterbrown.com/forum/b...eel-3d-printed
-
I am just going to leave this here as a preview of what I am trying to get a bit more control over velocity and maybe efficiency etc.
I have a in grip regulator for adjustment, I have a handful of springs I will be trying as well to see if I can reduce pressure and spring tension to get a bit deeper in a 12 gram for more shots, and reduce the force on the ball to help with breaks.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
So which version specifically is everyone ordering? I don’t see specs when I pull it up on Amazon other than it being in “paintball pistols”
T4E HDR .68 Caliber Revolver Training Pistol Paintball Gun Marker https://a.co/d/emaAc2k
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Comment
-
My guess it paint diameter. The bolt hammering on a smaller diameter of paint proves to break less. The bolt hammering on the .68 cal paint can break a hole into it followed by the air blast which makes a mess?
I also think some of the people buying these off of Amazon are effectively getting the higher powered ones bit they aren't clearly identified.
-
I would wager than the shell to fill ratio on .50 leans towards a thicker shell too
-
-
It needs real hard shell paint. It shoots FS better but the velocity is meh. I haven’t had the time to really dive into it. There is definitely a way to get the velocity up. But it can’t be by adding more force on the paintball it’s already to much as it is. It needs to use what it’s got more effective/ efficiently. It’s very ruff on paint.
Hard shell plus low velocity = bounce city (it’s hard to use effectively)
I really want it to they are so fun and cool looking.
Comment
-
I don't own one, but I wonder if there's a way to increase the dump chamber volume. It could be making up for low volume with too much pressure.
Comment
-
Sort of what I figured. Might just be what it is, until somebody figures out how to add a volumizer or something.
I plan on getting one of these in the future. But I'm blindly theorizing at the moment. Just tossing ideas.Last edited by Brokeass_baller; 10-16-2023, 07:04 PM. Reason: Sounded bad, originally. Lol. I'm not going blind.
Comment