Theorycrafting an Internal Pilot actuated autococker valve

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • devilzcall
    Mod everything
    • Jan 2022
    • 176
    • Dresden, Saxony, Germany

    #1

    Theorycrafting an Internal Pilot actuated autococker valve

    So I'm up late at night with what started out as a morph valve, but because I don't like copying peoples homework i racked my brain for other solutions to the problem.

    I have always been fascinated by the concept of pilot valves and the idea of integrating both the pilot and main valve into a single assembly.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Unbenannt.JPG
Views:	1096
Size:	369.1 KB
ID:	258016
    So what would i like to see happening here:
    • In its resting state, the cup seal shuttle is pressed on by the main pressure inside the left pilot chamber. The leftmost o-ring should allow air to pass through when the firing pin is in its resting position
    • On hammer strike the pilot chamber is sealed and then vented as the pin is pushed in
    • The pressure difference should now push the shuttle into the pilot chamber and fully open the valve in an instant
    • Once the pin resets (probably through a spring inside the pilot chamber, only on the pin, not the shuttle) the pilot chamber is again pressurized and seals the valve
    Much like the morph valve this system would work mostly pressure independent, but could achieve high flow rates for very short opening time with high pressure and a lightweight hammer. Alternatively you might be able to actuate the valve pin with a solenoid. Is that how the mq valve works?
    There might be some unintended side effects to the pilot chamber vent seal being part of the moving cup seal, but that could be fixed in design.
    If it doesn't have the [F] i don't want it. - Europoor
  • BrickHaus
    Tactical Spoon Reacquired
    • Sep 2020
    • 3396
    • Minnesota

    #2
    Its over my head honestly, but seems like it would work in theory, long as that dump chamber held enough volume to make the shot count.

    I THINK I see an issue? So from what I can tell can this valve would be dwell independent correct? By the shuttle valve sealing the inlet on shot. You get what you get out of the valve on hammer strike weather you open the valve for 4ms or 4 seconds.

    So if this worked, and or took off, how would you adjust a cocker? Just hpr adjustments and go?

    https://www.mcarterbrown.com/forum/b...khaus-feedback

    Comment


    • devilzcall
      devilzcall commented
      Editing a comment
      It's not dwell independent, it still let's air pass from the hpr through the valve as long as it's open. Dwell can be adjusted with the ivg as usual, but without it decreasing when increasing the pressure beyond the sweet spot.
  • Jordan
    I. Am. Canadian. 🇨🇦
    • Jul 2020
    • 3476
    • Southern Ontario, Canada

    #3
    I think this is how the MQ works. Very cool idea.
    And God turned to Gabriel and said: “I shall create a land called Canada of outstanding natural beauty, with majestic mountains soaring with eagles, sparkling lakes abundant with bass and trout, forests full of elk and moose, and rivers stocked with salmon. I shall make the land rich in oil so the inhabitants prosper and call them Canadians, and they shall be praised as the friendliest of all people.”

    “But Lord,” asked Gabriel, “Is this not too generous to these Canadians?”

    And God replied, “Just wait and see the neighbors I shall inflict upon them."

    Comment

    • devilzcall
      Mod everything
      • Jan 2022
      • 176
      • Dresden, Saxony, Germany

      #4
      Here's an update on the project. I figured you could gain a lot of volume by extending the valve in the other direction, slightly shortening the hammer stroke shouldn't be a problem.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	Overkill_Valve_Sketch.JPG
Views:	841
Size:	65.1 KB
ID:	258928
      Click image for larger version

Name:	Overkill_Valve2_2022-Apr-14_12-51-50PM-000_CustomizedView27985432909.png
Views:	819
Size:	272.4 KB
ID:	258929
      In its resting position, the valve shuttle is held forward since its surface area towards the rear valve chamber is greater than towards the front and the pressure is equal. By striking the valve pin, the rear chamber gets vented faster that air can flow in and the valve shuttle gets pushed in by the main pressure. Once the valve pin closes, the rear chamber can pressurise again, pushing the shuttle forward and closing the valve.

      Animation

      The Valve pin can be extended and driven by Your standard size valve spring and the shuttle shouldn't really need one (but it would be fairly easy to add to the design. The shuttle should open the valve excessively fast, regardless of the striking force.

      If it doesn't have the [F] i don't want it. - Europoor

      Comment

      • flyweightnate
        MCB Member
        • Jul 2020
        • 1853
        • Dallas, TX

        #5
        Very cool ideas!

        The second design looks very sensitive to inlet pressure, due to the large, unbalanced area on the front face of the pin. Might be worth addressing that to avoid some pretty serious hammer spring requirements.

        I'm gone watch this eagerly. Shame my Illusion uses 3/4" valves, not 11/16".
        Feedback
        www.PhrameworkDesigns.com < Nelspot, Sterling, and Phantom parts, plus the occasional big project.

        Comment

        • zinger565
          Bang Head Here
          • Apr 2022
          • 945
          • Wisconsin

          #6
          Like it a lot! Really cool action.

          I agree with flyweightnate about the unbalanced pin, but it shouldn't be too much worse than current valve design.

          If I'm understanding the flow, should be able to run fairly low pressure due to high flow rate, correct?

          Any other advantage besides that, running a clapper solenoid, and being different?

          Side note: if you ever get these machined, I'd definitely buy a few and test.
          MCB Feedback

          Comment

          • imped4now
            Bunker Buster
            • May 2021
            • 177

            #7
            Any updates on this?

            Comment

            • tyronejk
              Bunker Buster
              • Nov 2023
              • 369

              #8
              I found this and it does look interesting. I assume no one is currently working on this though, by the looks of it. I think to avoid the reliability/short lube interval problems the Morph valve has, it would be better to use oring face seals here instead of spool valves.

              Comment


              • markdem
                markdem commented
                Editing a comment
                With Dye making the Lazarus valve, theres not much need to create a valve like this unless you wanted something very specific

              • tyronejk
                tyronejk commented
                Editing a comment
                Yeah, you're probably right. After taking this design through a bunch of iterations, you'd probably end up with a Laz valve anyway.

              • devilzcall
                devilzcall commented
                Editing a comment
                I did not know of the Lazarus valve, though from my understanding it’s more or less the same as those zero kick(?) azodin valve kits that extend the valve stem into the front plug to counteract the pressure keeping the valve closed. Really cool system (and probably much more viable than this), but nowhere near my design.
            • devilzcall
              Mod everything
              • Jan 2022
              • 176
              • Dresden, Saxony, Germany

              #9
              So I did a bunch more work on this design a while back and recently picked it back up. I managed to reduce the number of O-rings to 4, by ditching most seals that don't need to hold pressure when the valve is not actuated.
              The firing Pin now forms a poppet seal that will hopefully hold air without an o-ring and has been extended to take a standard spring. I also added a return spring for the shuttle component.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	c4bf52e3-d3a5-49dd-bc2c-f777a3fd0a14.png
Views:	319
Size:	383.3 KB
ID:	510870

              Here is also an animation, though fusion has no way to handle springs: https://imgur.com/6dZ4UFX
              Last edited by devilzcall; 02-18-2024, 08:11 AM. Reason: redid the render
              If it doesn't have the [F] i don't want it. - Europoor

              Comment


              • tyronejk
                tyronejk commented
                Editing a comment
                Nice stack up of parts here, avoiding needing any threads or locking assembly. Your purple, red, and yellow part stack held together with just pressure and minimal additional orings is clever.

                I think keeping an oring to seal the pin would be more reliable though. Making either the pin or body out of softer plastic would work, but both those parts should be decently stiff to work well.

                Also, it looks like you designed in higher flow between the pin and red body than between the pin and yellow shuttle in order to keep the shuttle open when the pin is depressed, but that means the shuttle is probably going to be overdwelled. As an alternative, you could build in a step into the pin to change the relative flow rates, but I'm not sure if that would cause the shuttle to bounce back and forth while the pin is depressed.

                It does look like the yellow shuttle has a lot of throw and a lot of volume to vent behind it. I wonder if there are potential efficiency gains there by reducing both of those.

                Also, at some point, would you be willing to share dimensioned drawings? I'd love to machine one and see how it works. I could make and send you one in return.
            • Trbo323
              MCB Member
              • Jul 2020
              • 6358
              • Vancouver WA

              #10
              I don't understand how you are sealing that center pin. It seems to me that you'll just have air coming straight down the shaft to the hammer at rest

              Also, maybe I'm the only one but that animation is a lot harder to follow with the camera also moving.

              Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk


              I use Tapatalk which does NOT display comments. If you want me to see it, make it a post not a comment.

              Feedback
              https://www.mcarterbrown.com/forum/b...323-s-feedback

              Comment

              • AndrewTheWookiee
                Scenario/Pump/FSR
                • Jul 2020
                • 16

                #11
                The firing pin has a poppet-face seal at the back of the valve body.

                Looking at the overall operation, the current iteration of the valve is basically acting like an MQ with a physical valve at the back instead of a solenoid. Cut the firing pin down until it's just enough to seal the back of the valve body and be opened by the hammer, close up the front of the valve with a bleed hole to feed pressure to remove objects in the airflow path, and it's a mech MQ valve.

                *Edit - threw this together as an idea.
                Attached Files
                Last edited by AndrewTheWookiee; 02-19-2024, 05:54 PM.
                I don't know... fly casual

                Comment

                • Trbo323
                  MCB Member
                  • Jul 2020
                  • 6358
                  • Vancouver WA

                  #12
                  Originally posted by AndrewTheWookiee
                  The firing pin has a poppet-face seal at the back of the valve body.

                  Looking at the overall operation, the current iteration of the valve is basically acting like an MQ with a physical valve at the back instead of a solenoid. Cut the firing pin down until it's just enough to seal the back of the valve body and be opened by the hammer, close up the front of the valve with a bleed hole to feed pressure to remove objects in the airflow path, and it's a mech MQ valve.

                  *Edit - threw this together as an idea.
                  Awesome thanks that really cleared it up for me. I actually have a mq2 so that makes sense.

                  Is the poppet seal something that can be replaced or will it be specific to the valve?

                  Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk

                  I use Tapatalk which does NOT display comments. If you want me to see it, make it a post not a comment.

                  Feedback
                  https://www.mcarterbrown.com/forum/b...323-s-feedback

                  Comment

                  • AndrewTheWookiee
                    Scenario/Pump/FSR
                    • Jul 2020
                    • 16

                    #13
                    I haven't thought that far, that's one of those "we'll worry about that later" problems. 😄

                    * Edit - Actually, come to think of it, an internal groove at the back of the body for an o-ring to seal the firing pin might be easiest to implement for sourcing common parts and ease of replacement, as well as ensuring a good consistent seal. Or even simpler a simple undercut at the back of the body and using an o-ring as the face seal itself.
                    Last edited by AndrewTheWookiee; 02-19-2024, 06:44 PM.
                    I don't know... fly casual

                    Comment

                    • Trbo323
                      MCB Member
                      • Jul 2020
                      • 6358
                      • Vancouver WA

                      #14
                      As long as it seals up properly that idea would be amazing. One of my biggest fears with the mq2 is if it ever stops sealing, I don't really have a way to fix it easily

                      Here's another option for the way to do it, this is a vanguard Creed poppet seal. It's a little hard to see because of the way that they took this photo it's not the obvious o ring but to the left of that in between the white poppet head and the steel shaft there is an o-ring that is wedged in there. You can just barely see some black from it if you zoom in

                      It's a pretty trick little design because you have to unscrew the head from the shaft in order to change the o ring. But the way it's designed I will never lack of a poppet face seal since I can just replace the o-ring

                      Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk

                      I use Tapatalk which does NOT display comments. If you want me to see it, make it a post not a comment.

                      Feedback
                      https://www.mcarterbrown.com/forum/b...323-s-feedback

                      Comment

                      • AndrewTheWookiee
                        Scenario/Pump/FSR
                        • Jul 2020
                        • 16

                        #15
                        I don't mean to hijack the thread or anything, but I added a little o-ring face seal and changed the pin length so the valve pushes the pin and hammer back and resets the pin when it fully opens allowing the valve to close like a normally sprung valve without manually re-cocking the hammer, which should allow it to function in a pump.

                        I have done no calculations or assessments on this setup so for all I know it could fart like crazy or just not work at all and leave the valve stuck open until the hammer is manually reset either with the 3-way timing or pumped.



                        Attached Files
                        I don't know... fly casual

                        Comment


                        • devilzcall
                          devilzcall commented
                          Editing a comment
                          I like that your shuttle is actually hammering the valve pin back, should definitely help with resetting. I don't think you need cut slots everywhere to allow air to pass through unsealed clearances.
                      Working...