since we have a lot tech people good video to watch

[chrislognshot]

[JeepDVLZ45]

I love this type of stuff. I totally nerd out. Cudos to the inventor

[Siress]

As with a lot of technologies in this field, they look cool but do not work out. This one has a few apparent issues, so I googled to see if they were just discrepancies from reality for sake of animation. First thing I found was that they never even bothered to trademark the name: https://uspto.report/TM/87685679

Second thing was their 510(k) submission response the year prior: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_...17/K171493.pdf

Doesn't add up. Wonder if there's an SSED floating around... I didn't see one.

[SignOfZeta]

Yeah, this looks fake as hell. CG to attract investors for a product that will never work, see: Nikola trucks, Thernanos, most of what Elon Musk has done, etc.

[Siress]

Aside from it obviously being CGI, what about it looks fake to you SignOfZeta ?

[SignOfZeta]

Honestly, nothing. I see no specific red flags and I asked my better half to watch it, she’s a cardiac nurse with 15 years on the job, and she said it didn’t seem too out of the ordinary on the surface.

It just smells funny to me. I dislike the video itself, how it has so little reality in it and how it says “this device [does something]” as if it’s currently in use in humans every day instead of “this device [will do something if it ever exists]”. The doctor, frankly, reminds me of the doctor who renews my weed card virtually every two years. This video being three years old and their webpage no longer working also seems off. It has all the circumstantial cues of a Indigogo campaign that never reached funding.

[Siress]

Heh. Yeah. I design these types of things so the things I caught are not common knowledge - which is why I asked. I'd still love to see an SSED for this thing. Clearly it did not succeed as a product, but I'd like to know if it failed it's study and how.