So, I was perusing the "Custom Phantom" thread and admiring the pretties when I noticed how none of the guns I saw matched mine exactly; there were always some weird differences. With that in mind I was wondering what's up with mine. The differences;
-The "CCI" logo on mine doesn't match what I see. In place of the fancy logo, it just has "COMPONENT CONCEPTS INC" printed above the safety in plain capitals (the paint has entirely worn off but you can still see where it was)
-On the feedneck side it says "THE PHANTOM" in the same logo, but the logo looks to be way smaller. It could be due to how again the paint's entirely worn off but I dunno. Are those logos supposed to be painted on?
-Everyone else with the wraparound pump handle has a spring on their pump arm, mine's never had that.
-The barrel is gray, the rest of the gun is black. I've always wondered about this because I've never seen a solid gray Phantom (they're always either basic black or custom anno'ed) and I've never seen another Phantom with a mismatched barrel. The barrel itself has no trademarks on it from any aftermarket makers so I'm gonna guess its from CCI.
I bought this gun used in (I think) 1998 from a guy in the parking lot of a field I played on for $80. The price was a steal even at the time so I jumped on the deal. It shot well, but I remember having issues with the occasional "blooper" (really low-velocity shot) even back then. By some miracle it still airs up (even though I haven't taken it apart yet) and although the shots look a little sluggish on HPA it still shoots using old swelled-up paint.
The serial number (or what I presume to be the serial number, stamped on the bottom of the trigger guard) is "14300", and whoever put it there was having a bad day; the numbers are misaligned and the last two are way deeper than the first three. I don't know if that matters.
The one modification I've made was swapping the grip from the standard plastic "M-16" grip with one off an ICD Thunder Cat. Other than that, what you see was what I bought circa 1998. Is there something odd about my gun? Or is it just somebody's rando experiment? I did buy it in a parking lot after all.
-The "CCI" logo on mine doesn't match what I see. In place of the fancy logo, it just has "COMPONENT CONCEPTS INC" printed above the safety in plain capitals (the paint has entirely worn off but you can still see where it was)
-On the feedneck side it says "THE PHANTOM" in the same logo, but the logo looks to be way smaller. It could be due to how again the paint's entirely worn off but I dunno. Are those logos supposed to be painted on?
-Everyone else with the wraparound pump handle has a spring on their pump arm, mine's never had that.
-The barrel is gray, the rest of the gun is black. I've always wondered about this because I've never seen a solid gray Phantom (they're always either basic black or custom anno'ed) and I've never seen another Phantom with a mismatched barrel. The barrel itself has no trademarks on it from any aftermarket makers so I'm gonna guess its from CCI.
I bought this gun used in (I think) 1998 from a guy in the parking lot of a field I played on for $80. The price was a steal even at the time so I jumped on the deal. It shot well, but I remember having issues with the occasional "blooper" (really low-velocity shot) even back then. By some miracle it still airs up (even though I haven't taken it apart yet) and although the shots look a little sluggish on HPA it still shoots using old swelled-up paint.
The serial number (or what I presume to be the serial number, stamped on the bottom of the trigger guard) is "14300", and whoever put it there was having a bad day; the numbers are misaligned and the last two are way deeper than the first three. I don't know if that matters.
The one modification I've made was swapping the grip from the standard plastic "M-16" grip with one off an ICD Thunder Cat. Other than that, what you see was what I bought circa 1998. Is there something odd about my gun? Or is it just somebody's rando experiment? I did buy it in a parking lot after all.
Comment