I have an acquaintance that was selling his mint 2nd gen A-5 for a decent price so I snatched it up. The first gun I ever owned 30 years ago was a Tippmann Pro-Am, so I figured that I might as well keep a Tippmann in my collection.
Last Saturday I got to try it out for the first time (as well as my brand new CCI Phantom). I wanted to change the barrel even before I played with it but I figured I would try the stock one before doing so.
For the last 10+ years I've had all manners of high-end guns, but right now the 'flagship' of my collection is a fully-upgraded FLE Emek. So naturally I expected the A-5 to be inconsistent and therefore less accurate than what I'm used to. I had a few X-7s and Phenoms a while back and those were harsh on paint, so I expected the odd break or chop here and there.
Just to reiterate, the gun was bone-stock with a 48 cu/in Tippmann tank. I was using decent but otherwise not that great GI field paint.
Well, lo and behold, I was taken aback by the fact that it seemed to me to be as accurate as any of my current or previous markers. It was also fairly consistent over the chrono, where I set it at around 275 fps. Also, it did not kick like a mule which is not what I expected or remembered from using blowback guns in the past. Of course, my Emek is much smoother but that didn't bother me at all.
To top it off, I didn't get a single break or chop, and at times I was firing really fast. I must have fired a few hoppers worth of paint. Also, I could pull off decent strings of paint without that much effort, enough to keep the opposition down. There was another player sporting an A-5 wth a 10", 0.687 Lapco barrel and he let me try that barrel on my A-5. I got the exact same accuracy and I even thought that the sound signature was a tad stronger. The stock barrel is perfectly fine - I would only get an aftermarket barrel with an ID of 0.685 or lower as a back-up for really small paint.
Well colour me impressed!
Last Saturday I got to try it out for the first time (as well as my brand new CCI Phantom). I wanted to change the barrel even before I played with it but I figured I would try the stock one before doing so.
For the last 10+ years I've had all manners of high-end guns, but right now the 'flagship' of my collection is a fully-upgraded FLE Emek. So naturally I expected the A-5 to be inconsistent and therefore less accurate than what I'm used to. I had a few X-7s and Phenoms a while back and those were harsh on paint, so I expected the odd break or chop here and there.
Just to reiterate, the gun was bone-stock with a 48 cu/in Tippmann tank. I was using decent but otherwise not that great GI field paint.
Well, lo and behold, I was taken aback by the fact that it seemed to me to be as accurate as any of my current or previous markers. It was also fairly consistent over the chrono, where I set it at around 275 fps. Also, it did not kick like a mule which is not what I expected or remembered from using blowback guns in the past. Of course, my Emek is much smoother but that didn't bother me at all.
To top it off, I didn't get a single break or chop, and at times I was firing really fast. I must have fired a few hoppers worth of paint. Also, I could pull off decent strings of paint without that much effort, enough to keep the opposition down. There was another player sporting an A-5 wth a 10", 0.687 Lapco barrel and he let me try that barrel on my A-5. I got the exact same accuracy and I even thought that the sound signature was a tad stronger. The stock barrel is perfectly fine - I would only get an aftermarket barrel with an ID of 0.685 or lower as a back-up for really small paint.
Well colour me impressed!
Comment