New Planet Eclipse high-end loader: CF200

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • martix_agent
    MCB Member
    • Jul 2020
    • 528
    • Indiana

    #16
    Originally posted by Trbo323

    The problem with this idea in the past is it just moves the breakage point from the feedneck itself to wherever the feedback connects to the plastic shell.

    Not saying someone won't figure out a good way to do it at some point but that's been what happens in the past.

    Not sure I like the rechargeable battery, I'm always a fan of being able to fix a problem at the field rather than having to put the equipment away. Small potatoes though, looks like a good design so far

    Wonder if it can feed reball
    i've been using the spire rechargeable battery pack for years. Works great!
    When my spire back cap finally breaks, im gonna buy the PE hopper. The price and quality look good to me.

    Comment

    • Super Nova
      Old School
      • Jul 2020
      • 1863
      • Oregon

      #17
      I wanted to try out a DRV but couldn't justify the price cause I knew I wasn't going to use the screen, seems like this one might be what I was looking for.
      Feedback: https://www.mcarterbrown.com/forum/b...ova-s-feedback
      WTB: ICD stuff, single trigger electro frames, Gloss lime and purple parts, smoke hoppers

      Comment

      • goofyman23
        Indecisive++
        • Jul 2020
        • 301
        • New England

        #18
        Originally posted by Trbo323

        The problem with this idea in the past is it just moves the breakage point from the feedneck itself to wherever the feedback connects to the plastic shell.

        Not saying someone won't figure out a good way to do it at some point but that's been what happens in the past.

        Not sure I like the rechargeable battery, I'm always a fan of being able to fix a problem at the field rather than having to put the equipment away. Small potatoes though, looks like a good design so far

        Wonder if it can feed reball
        The feedneck to loader shell interface seems like a prime failure point. Feels similar to RC: replace a plastic part with a metal and it just moves the weak point somewhere else. Appears to be 3 self tappers holding it in place; I remain cautiously optimistic.
        image.pngimage.png​
        Feedback 🔫🔫
        Regular at Matt's.

        Dumpster Fire PB

        Comment

        • RPP
          You even shooty ball Bro?
          • Dec 2023
          • 560

          #19
          Originally posted by goofyman23

          The feedneck to loader shell interface seems like a prime failure point. Feels similar to RC: replace a plastic part with a metal and it just moves the weak point somewhere else. Appears to be 3 self tappers holding it in place; I remain cautiously optimistic.
          image.pngimage.png
          This was my concern in the beginning also. The DRV has been out for a bit now and i have not seen "virtue spire" level of things exploding apart so that good news.

          Comment

          • tyronejk
            Bunker Buster
            • Nov 2023
            • 375

            #20
            Agree about the feedneck. I would bet money that the separate aluminum feedneck is a cost-saving measure.

            Comment


            • RPP
              RPP commented
              Editing a comment
              How so? As in the injection process for making the shell is cheaper ?
          Working...