instagram takipci satin al - instagram takipci satin al mobil odeme - takipci satin al

bahis siteleri - deneme bonusu - casino siteleri

bahis siteleri - kacak bahis - canli bahis

goldenbahis - makrobet - cepbahis

cratosslot - cratosslot giris - cratosslot

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RTR Gargoyle II & Warthog Interest Thread - V2

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cunha
    replied
    I think most people are going to want the warhog pump on the garg2, because of the undercocking.

    For phantoms I like the standard pump handle, but since these are going to be cocker threaded, it makes sense for the pump handle not to touch the barrel since the barrels are all over the place diameter wise.

    And I know about the gargoyle bushing system guys, but undercocking is a better way to go for this.

    Leave a comment:


  • RTR
    replied
    Try being the guy who had to send it back after he got a glimpse! Hopefully you've learned your lesson and won't sell your Gargoyle II!

    As for pricing, nothing is set in stone yet. I'll update everyone as we go! Markers will both be autococker threaded.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jkoselka
    replied
    Sweet on the list. Everytime I see that video it's like watching wedding videos of an exwife, wish I still had her.

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidBoren
    replied
    How much are we looking at for a Warthog? Or is this one of those situations that if I have to ask, I can't afford it?

    Why the Warthog, Sir?

    Because M12-LRV is too long to say in common conversation, son.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nish
    replied
    This could probably answer a lot of questions. Of Course RTR will have to speak on if there are any changes from the original plan https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/g...-the-warthog#/

    Leave a comment:


  • binson
    replied
    Originally posted by Nish View Post

    Gargoyle 2 was going to be Cocker threaded with an AC to Phantom adaptor same as the original. I thought the Warthog was going to be the same but I don't see that in the images so I will keep my mouth shut about that one.
    Awesome! Thanks Nish!

    Leave a comment:


  • Nish
    replied
    Originally posted by binson View Post
    Sorry for my ignorance, but what barrel threads were/are the gargoyle and warthog going to be?
    Gargoyle 2 was going to be Cocker threaded with an AC to Phantom adaptor same as the original. I thought the Warthog was going to be the same but I don't see that in the images so I will keep my mouth shut about that one.

    Leave a comment:


  • binson
    replied
    Sorry for my ignorance, but what barrel threads were/are the gargoyle and warthog going to be?

    Leave a comment:


  • Rusty Brass
    replied
    Yup. Take my money.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mechstar
    replied
    For those interested in the “special sauce” inside the Gargoyle 2, here is a link to my folder with all my photos from the development thread.



    And... the Warthog




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Mechstar
    replied
    Now some open class goodness. I would LOVE a gas through grip, bottomline Warthog! Hint, Hint








    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Mechstar
    replied
    How can we have an interest thread without photos to, well...stoke interest!
    Some folks also maybe never saw the Garg2/Warthog development thread, or the crowdsource campaign either.
    I was waiting for Rodney or Dan to put up some eye candy, but since I had saved pretty much any view that had been posted of the two designs, I dug them up for you all to ogle. Enjoy!
    First the Gargoyle 2:








    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • GARGOYLE
    replied
    Originally posted by Chuck E Ducky View Post
    I don’t see why you couldn’t make a Gargoyle open class all you would need is make the top body piece with some sort of attachment that attaches at the back body ring like the feed tube. Is there any reason it’s got to be it own marker? It would be cool if you could just pull the feed tube and body half and drop in an open class feed.
    Respectfully there is an answer to this. You are not the first person to ask this question. The simple answer was that I (Formerly RTR) did not want to do this to my design. The Gargoyle is too good looking and was very specifically designed to be a sleek Stock Class marker for the Stock Class players. There are a ton of options for open class players out there and I wanted to give something special to the Stock Class community. The Warthog should be a great option and we will have to wait and see what it's future is. !!

    Rodney was very much against that idea feeling that dedicated bodies were the way to go. It wasn't my interest but the Warthog had a really neat setup for opening up the breach for cleaning/swapping parts. If I remember right I think it was something like the old Angels.

    I worked on a feed block for open class conversion of the Gargoyle for a while. With the current lines of the Gen 1 at least. Its hard to make it look good.
    Thanks Nish, Hadn't seen your post on this when I submitted this one.
    Last edited by GARGOYLE; 07-15-2020, 03:32 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • RTR
    commented on 's reply
    You've made it on the list! Send me your email and IRL name via PM or email: dan@remembertheronin.com

  • RTR
    commented on 's reply
    Added you! Send me your email and IRL name via PM or email: dan@remembertheronin.com
Working...
X